Lawsuit Self-Help - Step-by-Step
Learn Case-Winning Lawsuit Procedure ... In a Single Weekend!
Lawsuit Self-Help ... Step-by-Step ... On the Web Since 1997
Protect Yourself from Lawyers ... Even Your Own ... Know What It Takes to Win
Toll Free: 866-Law-Easy
Attorney Frederick Graves and Wife Kathryn
Works in All Courts
State and Federal
- - - - - - -
Why Risk Losing?

Used your tutorials to take on Capital One Bank and win! The Courthouse was buzzing for days!
C. Kirkpatrick

Jurisdictionary helped me defeat 4 attorneys from 2 large law firms.
T. Karantsalis

I am very impressed with how it simplifies matters yet explains thoroughly.
J.D. Wheeler

What is most compelling is how simple it is!
Douglas W.

Readable, flowing, and sometimes breathless.
Times Union, Albany, NY

More Testimonials

Jurisdictionary ®
PMB-11185, P.O. Box 2428
Pensacola, Florida 32513
Toll Free: 866-Law-Easy  
 
© 2006 by Frederick Graves
All Rights Reserved

U

Ultra Vires
    Latin for "beyond the life", i.e., outside authority. This phrase is most often used to describe the unauthorized act of a corporate officer or trustee who undertakes to do an act that is beyond his actual power.

Undue Influence
    When someone influences another who is susceptible of being swayed in opinion or decision because of mental infirmity or other debilitating factors, causing the weakened person to make a legal choice (such as changing their will) the wrongful act is called undue influence.
    Upon being presented with sufficient evidence of undue influence, a court my reverse the act, e.g., nullifying the will.
    In some states a legal presumption of undue influence arises if the influencer occupies a position of trust with the person unduly influenced (e.g., a child or long-term caretaker), actively participates in the influenced act (e.g., taking the person of weakened mind to a lawyer to change the will), and is favored by the influenced act (e.g., becoming a beneficiary under the altered will).

Unintentional
    Without intent. Under some concepts of common law, every crime requires the element of intent, i.e., the act complained of must result from some intentional act of the accused. In civil law, this is not always so, since a civil action will lie for damages resulting from bone-headed stupidity or blind ignorance as well as for damages resulting from the defendant’s direct intention to cause the plaintiff injury.

Unjust Enrichment
    A cause of action in equity to prevent one party from gaining an unfair advantage (unjust enrichment) at the expense of another party without some reasonable benefit being returned.
    This may be called the "something for nothing" doctrine. Equity rules the law. Therefore, where one party is unjustly enriched by an act the deprives another of property (even if the act is technically "legal") American courts can exercise their equitable power to reverse the gain to prevent unjust enrichment, because equity rules the law.
    This is sometimes a difficult concept for novices in the law to understand. Some believe they can make a wrong "right" if they find a "law" to hide in. Though this was clearly the way things were in the days of Charles Dickens (read Dickens’ Bleak House and Hard Times to learn the pitiable state of the legal system in England only two hundred years ago, when the poor were without any hope at all before the pomp of courts where white-powdered wigs strutted about the courtrooms spouting every excuse under heaven why wrong should be treated as right.), our American legal system today will not tolerate such injustices (if the wronged party knows what his lawyer should be doing to recover the loss and presses forward with clean hands).
    Equity uncovers the cloak of unjust men and works "right" to prevent wrong, even where there is "law" that would otherwise give the unjust person the advantage.
    An example of  unjust enrichment is where a landlord enters into a lease with his tenant who later is unable to pay the rent as it comes due and must vacate the premises before the expiration of his lease. Certainly, under most jurisdictions in America, the landlord is entitled to his rent money, even after the tenant moves out, because there is remaining time agreed to under the lease, and the tenant promised to pay for the full term of the lease. Otherwise the landlord is left with empty property, and the tenant is unjustly enriched by being let off the hook. The landlord should be permitted to sue and get an un-paid rent judgment against the tenant for the remainder of the lease term ... if, in fact, he is unable to rent the property to someone else. But, suppose the landlord were to find another tenant and start collecting rent from the new tenant while suing the old tenant. This would be a form of unjust enrichment, and equity would prevent the landlord from double-dipping.
    There are many other examples of unjust enrichment, some of which seem to fly in the face of ancient contract principles. For example, if a young man entrusts the care of his farm to a friend while he goes off to war and returns years later to discover his friend has claimed title to the land by adverse possession, the court could exercise its equitable powers to hear an action brought for unjust enrichment against the friend to prevent the wrong.
    Remember: Equity rules the law. 

Usurious
    Of or related to usury, q.v.

Usury
    The act of charging exorbitant rates of interest. In some states usury laws render promissory notes or other obligations exacting exorbitant interest rates unenforceable in court. In some circumstances, usury is a punishable crime related to fraud.

Ux
    See uxor.

Uxor
    Strictly a lawfully married wife. The term is sometimes shortened to simply "ux".

- # -

Your Competitive Edge !

Why take chances?

I ordered your materials on May 31st, and by June 28th the lawsuit against me was "Dismissed with Prejudice." Many thanks as I was clueless until I reviewed your videos and files.
Tracy

Jurisdictionary works!
Won against a powerful attorney. Even the other attorneys in the gallery were talking about it.
K. Anderson

The CDs are great!
R. Bonderman

Any pro-se litigant simply NEEDS this information ...
... all of it!
M. Bock

Won 4 motions in court yesterday. Wish I’d had your tutorials a year ago!
Linda T.

I am so glad I read your teaching on the complaint before I filed it. One of the defendants wanted to settle immediately.
L. Shelby

Thanks for your tutorial "Evidence Made Easy". The way you explain the rules is so effective that we pro se plaintiffs have confidence in our fight for what's right.
Arcenio A.

A simplified course in the basics.
Sun-Sentinel
Fort Lauderdale.

Jurisdictionary increased my understanding several hundredfold.
V. Wright

A guide to the rules attorneys follow in civil lawsuits.
The Charlotte Observer

Great!
Joe & Cheryl B.

 

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

OUR MISSION STATEMENT
  "To promote the public's peace and prosperity through better
understanding of American Justice, the Rule of Law, and the principles
and practices of due process that control our American Courts."
 
Jurisdictionary® is the registered trademark of Attorney Frederick Graves
 
©1997-2007 by Attorney Frederick Graves - All Rights Reserved
PMB-11185, P.O. Box 2428, Pensacola, FL 32513
Because We Deliver Immediately by Email ... All Sales Are Final
On-Line Research by LoisLaw